LEGENDS OF
LIGHT MUSIC
Morton Gould

MORTON GOULD, AN
AMERICAN GENIUS
By Enrique Renard
Legend has it that
Mozart could compose at age five.
That he, in fact, was too young
to write his own music, hence his
father would do the writing with
the boy standing by his side and
singing the melody.
Mozart biographers
insist that the thing goes beyond
legend, that such an unusual feat
was factual. That may well be the
case, because musical genius,
similar to that of any other
field of endeavor is a
spontaneous thing that cannot be
rationalized. It is also quite
infrequent. There have been very
few Mozarts that history could
account for. Amazingly, one of
them was born in the USA, New
York, December 10th, 1913, the
son of James Harry Gould (real
name Isidor Godfeld, of
Bulgaria), who migrated to the
USA on May 1910, and who, among
other chores oriented to economic
survival, used to play fiddle in
a Yiddish Theater.
James
economic survival was seriously
marred by great business ideas
and horrible execution. He once
came up with an idea for an
engraved wooden compact to be
used as a cigarette or lipstick
holder. It would be manufactured
in Austria, and upon sample
showing it attracted immediate
attention, reflecting a huge
first order. The problem was that
the items were handmade, and to
fill the order would have taken
years! The deal of course fell
through and economic misery
continued to hound James, despite
which, and with the additional
burden of bad health, he managed
to marry Frances Arkin, a pretty
young woman from a German-Jewish
family he had met on the boat
from Europe and which he had
reconnected with during a visit
to recover his health at the N.Y.
Catskill Mountains.
James and his wife
settled in Queens County, then a
scarcely populated New York area
of rapid urban development, and
it was there that their first
three children were born: Morton,
December 10th, 1913, Alfred, June
23rd, 1915, and Walter, April
12th, 1917.
Music was not the
life of the family then, but it
was important to them. James
would play the violin and at the
household there was a player
piano complete with rolls of
popular classics such as Light
Cavalry Overture, Poet and
Peasant Overture,
Rachmaninovs Prelude in C,
Chopins Polonaises, and
other famous classical pieces. It
is quite likely that the frequent
listening to such music awoke the
prodigy in young Morton at the
tender age of 4, for in an
interview with Roy Hemming in
1985 he said that one day his
mother Frances heard the piano
being played at the living room
(probably somewhat hesitatingly).
Puzzled, she went there to
investigate and found little
Morton playing away with his
chubby little fingers, imitating
what he had heard from the rolls.
His father James
had, however, a different version
as to the discovery of his
sons talent. He stated that
one day upon return from work he
heard a flawed rendition of
"Stars and Stripes
Forever" being played at the
home piano. To his surprise he
saw young Morton at the keyboard.
The sound was not coming from the
roll.
Frances recalls
that the family finally seized on
the boys talent only after
an occasion in which James was
away on business. Morton, then
barely five and depressed by his
fathers absence, went over
to the piano and played a sad
melody of his own. "It was
at that moment", she said,
"that I realized we had
someone quite unusual in the
family".
But financial woes
seem to besiege the family
endlessly, fueled essentially by
James flawed attempts at
doing profitable business. He
would gain employment for a
while, but then he would quit
enthused by some business
prospect at hand which eventually
wouldnt work. As a result
of some unpaid debts someone came
over and removed the piano from
the household. Frances was
devastated (and probably so was
Morton despite his young age).
But James was a salesman, and he
managed to hustle a piano back
into his home, thus avoiding
unnecessary interruption in his
sons musical development.
Morton took his
first piano lessons in 1919 from
Ferdinand Greenwald, a local
piano teacher who, apparently,
didnt attach much
importance to musical theory. He
did not teach his pupils how to
read music. But there was no
stopping to Mortons rapidly
unfolding talent. Eventually he
took classes with a
Vienna-trained musical teacher at
the Institute of Musical Art, a
few years later.
But it was
Greenwald who was the one
involved in that famous and
factual story about Mortons
beginnings as a composer that
parallels that of Mozarts.
The boy was scarcely six years
old when he came up with what was
appropriately titled "Just
Six, Waltz Viennese by Morton
Gould" transcribed by
Greenwald into a score, and the
illustrious career of one of the
most talent and prolific American
classical music composers was
launched then and there. Morton
refused to feel proud about that
accomplishment, calling it
"pretty awful, nothing but a
sweet little waltz with some
schmaltz in it
"
Schmaltzy it may have been, but
try to imagine a six year old
composing a waltz, however
menial. It isnt easy. As a
matter of fact it becomes nearly
impossible.
It may come as a
surprise to readers who have been
Morton Goulds fans as a
composer, arranger and purveyor
of what is termed Light
Orchestral Music, to know that he
composed several symphonic
concertos, for piano, for violin,
for viola, for tuba, etc., plus
several symphonettes. He
arranged, composed and conducted
numerous Tin Pan Alley songs, and
had several LP albums masterfully
arranged that sold well. But this
was not something he was proud
of. He saw it as a necessary
commercial thing oriented to give
him financial income and
security, especially considering
that he had been appointed the
sole provider for his family.
James took upon himself to
conduct Mortons career
along such lines, and the young
man went along with it staying
with popular music in radio shows
and records despite his strong
inclinations to compose and play
classical music that could be
termed "serious".
The extent to
which his fathers guidance
interfered with an appropriate
perception on the part of
American and European music
circles about Morton Goulds
talent as a serious classical
musician and composer cannot be
overestimated. The impression
gathered was that because he
arranged and played Jerome Kern,
Cole Porter and Gershwin songs on
the radio he could not possibly
be a "serious"
musician.
Inevitably, he
eventually fell into that well
known mistake musicians and
critics who call themselves
"serious" invariably
fall. Light Orchestral Music,
arranged and played by a
symphonic outfit cannot be
considered "serious"
music. Oh, no. Only traditional
classical music deserves such
consideration. I submit that this
perception comes from a wrong way
of focusing the different styles
in music. There is of course what
is termed "pop" music.
But the term represents a
dangerous generalization. What is
"pop" (a contraction of
"popular") in music? Is
it country music, with its
simplicity, repetitive sound and
musical limitations? Yes, it
would fit that description. But
then, what about jazz? Is that
"serious music, in its
multiplicity of forms? To some,
no, it is not. Too raucous, too
syncopated. Well, what about Tin
Pan Alley or Broadway songs? No,
not exactly. Too simple, most of
it is sentimental mush, and too
brief. What about when they are
arranged for large symphonic
orchestra. Well, no. They are too
melodic, you see. And those
lyrics! Too sentimental. No.
Thats only for simple
minded people with not enough
musical sensitiveness to
appreciate Bach, Beethoven,
Charles Ives or John Cage.
Schönberg and his 12 tone scale?
Oh, yes! Stravinsky and his
violent atonality? By all means!
That is indeed
"seriousness" in music.
Seriously?
It is an
undisputed fact that in music,
perhaps more than in any other
field of the arts, with the
probable exception of painting,
there is a wide variety of
tastes. What is it that
determines taste in music is
difficult to tell. Individual
sensitivity, a good ear, good
taste, a natural ability to
recognize beauty in sound
(whatever the source), cultural
upbringing, you name it. It is
also unquestionably true that
there is music that can scarcely
qualify as such. A good example
of this is a composition by John
Cage called "Four
Minutes" that constitutes
total silence. Mr. Cage comes in
while the orchestra sits there
waiting for him. He bows, then he
stands in front of the symphonic
outfit (oh, yes, it has to be
symphonic, you see) and
doesnt move a muscle. After
four minutes - hence the title -
he bows again and leaves. The
attendees applaud politely,
looking grave and knowledgeable.
This, to them is the epitome of
"serious" music, it
would seem.
And then we have
Charles Ives, touted by many
critics as a true genius of
"serious" music, who
got furious at his publisher when
the man changed in one of
Ives scores a note that
seemed totally wrong and out of
place. "You are trying to
make things nice
", he
said. "Please
dont
I want it like
that: as unmusical as
possible
"
Lets take
another example. This time from
one of the greater exponents of
Rock-and-Roll: Ozzie Osborne,
whose presentation included
eating live chicken and bats on
stage under fiercely loud noise
from drums and the distorted
wailing of amplified guitars
being smashed against the stage
floor, with blood spilling
generously over the interpreters
while a crazed audience of mostly
teenagers howls thunderously with
pleasure.
Personal tastes
aside, I would venture to say
that the aforementioned examples
have nothing to do with music.
They have to do, in the first
instance, with the gigantic ego
of the late Mr. Cage, and his
insatiable appetite to be
considered different, therefore
special, superior to everyone
else. In the second case, two
elements concur: a) Mr.
Osbornes appetite for
money, and b) a desire to be and
get others worked up into a
frenzy (hence the prevalence of
drugs among rock-and-rollers).
But music is nowhere to be heard.
Thus we can now
safely, I think, discard the
aforementioned examples as
"serious" music. The
problem is that, at least in the
case of rock, they are immensely
profitable despite its almost
complete lack of musical value,
if we are to consider the opinion
of reputable musicologists who
have carefully analyzed the
genre.
What has all of
this to do with Morton Gould, you
may be asking? It has everything
to do with him. By age 20 Gould
had developed into an
extraordinary musician, with a
remarkable ability to compose at
classical level as well as
lighter pieces when he wished or
when commissioned for it. By then
his father James as well as the
rest of the family got used to
the idea that their financial
woes could be solved by
Mortons musical career and
the financial rewards it was
supposed to bring. This turned
out to be a misconception. Under
James direction,
Mortons musical career
never really took off.
Commissions were
plenty, for festivals, for radio
shows, for symphonic works played
by famous orchestras, for
introduction of his own classical
compositions, for ballets, for
movies. Most of this output was
lauded by his peers and by
reputed critics. But the general
perception among the public,
producers and the musical
industry in general of Morton
being only a Cole Porter light
music man, just a "pop"
music arranger, remained with him
as a stigma he could never quite
remove from his career.
Morton was able to
appreciate tunes from Tin Pan
Alley and Broadway, composers
such as Cole Porter, Gershwin,
Jerome Kern, Irving Berlin, and
other writers of that wonderful
period covered by the 20s, the
30s and 40s, where songs were
composed which are still being
recorded and playednearly 90
years later! But these were not
considered "serious"
music by the pundits of the time.
It is a fact that Chopin,
Rachmaninov, Tchaikowsky, Liszt,
and even Beethoven, used folk
themes in their symphonic works.
The "nationalists" that
followed, such as Khachaturian,
Enescu, Falla, Albeniz, Rodrigo,
Grieg, Rimsky-Korsakov, Smetana,
Vaughn Williams and others did so
too. Should we be inclined to
consider their work "not
serious" because of it?
It seems to me
that this type of snobbery should
be recognized for what it is:
something valueless, destructive
and unfair. Unfortunately, Morton
Gould himself was not immune to
that stereotype, to the extent
that he used to deprecate his own
work. He once stated that he did
not feel "patronizing"
towards popular music when
referring to the aforementioned
popular songs. The type of music
heard on the radio and records
during the decades of the 20s,
30s, and 40s were something he
enjoyed to some extent, but that
he worked with mainly because of
its commercial value. His inner
conflict developed because of the
need to record and play what his
father told him to in order to
make money versus and his longing
to compose and play
"progressive" classical
music, atonal and otherwise. At
age 30 his compositions included
shades of jazz elements such as
the blues, folk and a tendency to
go along with Bernstein, Hanson,
Barber, Ives and other American
contemporary composers he admired
but perceived as competition.
And, for some mysterious reason,
Gould had serious doubts about
his own musical talent, even
suffering bouts of depression as
a result. He was under contact
with Columbia for quite a while,
but in 1954 he moved to RCA.
At RCA they had an
eye on Kostelanetz and his
enormous sales input with Light
Orchestral Music, reaching over
53 million by the early 50s for
Columbia, and they wanted
something similar. Gould had
radio contracts where he had been
presenting popular tunes arranged
for orchestras including large
string sections, hence RCA felt
Morton was their chance to attain
similar success. But they
encountered a problem.
Goulds musical concept was
entirely different from that of
Kostelanetz. He once stated:
"I cannot just play the
melody straight. I state the
theme, and then go somewhere
else". That may have been
musically interesting and
correct, but it was not popular.
Percy Faith and Jackie Gleason
had undoubtedly the greatest
measure of popularity then and in
the years that followed, plus the
greatest sales numbers with Light
Music essentially because they
played the melodies absolutely
straight, something quite
uninteresting for the better
educated ears. But an educated
ear is not to be found at popular
levels. Hence the continual
battle between producers and
musicians. Musicians like Gould
wanted to record interesting
music. But that didnt sell.
Uninteresting music played by
large orchestras did sell by the
millions, and Morton had to
comply. Still he managed to
always inject interesting
concepts in his arrangements of
popular tunes, special sonorities
and colours, sounds that made it
possible to quickly identify The
Morton Gould Orchestra, as it was
labeled.
By the mid 60s and
on, some of the surviving
arrangers from the 40s and 50s
with famous orchestras were being
asked to play rock! That was an
enormous absurdity, but the music
business is crammed with people
who dont care about music
but care very much about money!
Gleason was a businessman who had
violent disputes with his
arrangers when they wrote some
interesting phrase in a score. He
forced them to write what people
liked. "Stick with the
melody!...", was the order,
and he sold millions of LPs world
wide. But for true musicians,
interested in good music and new,
interesting musical ideas, the
situation was sheer torment, and
the era of Light Orchestral Music
came to an end by the mid sixties
as a result.
Morton was a
complex man. The dichotomies
present in his character could be
puzzling. He was essentially a
shy man, quiet and unassuming,
who could go into a fit of rage
that sometimes terrified his
immediate family. The possessor
of a strong libido, he was what
someone would euphemistically
term "a ladies man".
Physically he wouldnt have
conformed anything resembling
masculine beauty, far from it. He
had an unusual, long, pear shaped
face, a receding chin and too
ample a forehead. But he could
whisper into the ear of a woman
such poetic, sweet words, he
became quite successful at the
art of seduction. He was
extremely eloquent, both orally
and in writing. But, as he
himself insisted, he had only two
true loves in his life, and both
were named Shirley.
The first one was
Shirley Uzin whom he fell in love
with at Richmond Hill High School
"physically, intellectually
and in every conceivable
way", he stated. He felt she
was his twin soul, a part of him
that had been missing all his
life. She was an intelligent,
well read and cultured young
woman who appreciated good music,
"with none of those
ridiculous feminine inanities
most girls have concerning
sexuality, therefore she is
regarded as abnormal, immoral and
God knows what", he wrote to
Abby Whiteside, one of his first
teachers and a dear friend. The
marriage took place in 1936, but
it was doomed to disaster.
Shirley was an intensely
independent woman, not in the
least interested in being a
housewife or taking care of a
husband. She was politically
inclined, and she is said to have
been a member of the American
Communist Party, which eventually
caused Morton to be investigated
by the infamous U.S.
Congressional Committee for the
Investigation Un-American
Activities during the 50s, with
no consequences.
Morton was not
much of a householder either. One
morning Shirley prepared some
rice for Mortons lunch in a
square Pyrex container, telling
him: "Just take the rice the
way it is, put it in a pan, and
light the stove. Once warm, put
it in a plate. Dont do
anything else". When Morton
got hungry, he went into the
kitchen and followed directions
placing the dish into the pan,
lit the stove and ambled back to
work. "Suddenly there was
this horrible explosion", he
says, "and I didnt
know what had happened. The
kitchen looked like a World War I
battlefield
" To this
day, those sitting in that
kitchen and looking at the
ceiling will be baffled by those
poke marks in it. Little would
they suspect they were caused by
rice!
On another
occasion he decided to warm up a
frozen food item and placed it in
a pot with hot water without
removing it from the box. The
reader may now gather an idea of
Mortons culinary abilities.
Interested more in
her politics and in her
independent ways, Shirley did
nothing to save the marriage, and
Morton, still quite young, had no
way of dealing effectively with
the situation. To his dismay,
divorce became inevitable.
After a few years
and a number of affairs he said
to be meaningless, around his
30th birthday Morton started to
date vivacious and pretty Shirley
Bank, youngest child of an
affluent Jewish family from
Minneapolis. Somehow now free
from his fixation with Shirley
Uzin, Morton fell in love head
over heels with his new Shirley,
who held a degree in English and
Spanish from the University of
Minnesota and lived part of the
year in New York. They met on a
blind date in 1943, and embarked
in a peculiarly intense love
relationship. She was sweet and
innocent, and seemingly only
interested in him. They were
married on June 3rd. 1944 and had
four children.
Shirley Bank was
not interested in music at first,
but she eventually came to like
and admire her husbands
work and offer him every support.
She was seven years younger than
him. Still, as years went by, a
feature in his character
increasingly started to annoy her
and ended driving a deep wedge
between them that ended in
divorce as well: he became
tighter and tighter with money
concerning her and the household,
and she intensely resented that.
Independent and determined, she
came to regard him as a nuisance,
and the final rupture was
inevitable after a good number of
years.
Meanwhile,
Mortons musical career
flourished inevitably. He
composed the now famous American
Symphonettes and Concertettes,
short symphonic works where he
tried to state an American
classical musical language with
jazz and folk music overtones
masterfully blended into his
symphonic structures. Fritz
Reiner, of the Chicago Symphony,
admired his classical works and
so did Dimitri Mitropoulos,
renowned classical conductors at
the time, who continually played
his music. He gave piano
recitals, was with the New York
Philharmonic as guest conductor
on several occasions, and
conducted the Chicago Symphony
and several other Symphonic
Orchestras all over the world
featuring his own works together
with other classic repertoire.
Among his works we should
mentionAmerican Salute, American
Ballads, Classic Variations on
Colonial Themes, Spirituals for
Orchestra, Cowboy Rhapsody, Latin
American Symphonette, Minute Rag
Waltz, Stringmusic, and countless
other symphonic works. He wrote
the music for the ballets Fall
River Legend, Arms and a Girl (a
Musical) and Clarinade. His was
the music for Holocaust, the well
known TV Miniseries. He collected
7 Grammies as a result of his
enormous talent and output. In
1994 he was awarded the Kennedy
Center Honors, and in 1995 he was
awarded the Pulitzer Prize for
his composition Stringmusic.
Of his Light Music
LPs, three stand out as
extraordinary examples of light
music turned into real symphonic
pieces, all recorded in the 50s:
"Memories", featuring
songs from the 20s, wherein he
manages to get the whole
orchestra to swing, not an easy
feat. "Kern and Porter
Favorites" and "Beyond
the Blue Horizon" came later
in arrangements with a lovely
rhapsodic style. Upon careful
listening to his arrangements of
these songs for orchestra, one
concludes that it is impossible
to arrange them better. Its
not only the technical
virtuosity, the imagination to
improvise with lovely variations
on the themes, the colours he
injected or the good taste in
sound he displayed. It is also
the emotion he conveyed without
any sort of cheap sentimentality
or mush. My friend Frank Bristow
once told me he had tears in his
eyes listening to Goulds
arrangement of Time on my Hands.
Those songs, great as they are,
never reach your heart as deeply
as they do when arranged and
played by Morton Gould.
The 70s were a
painful period for Gould. Light
Music had practically disappeared
from radio and recordings,
commissions started to falter as
well, and the financial
arrangements concerning his
divorce from Shirley Bank left
him in a precarious financial
position. But then something
happened that saved the
situation. He was appointed
president of ASCAP the American
Society of Composers, Authors,
and Publishers, with a six figure
salary. At the time ASCAP was
said to be a veritable snake pit
besieged by internal conflicts,
with two prominent Board members
vying for power who apparently
felt that they needed a president
with no guts to continue their
maneuverings unabated. Morton,
then aged 72 and of gentle
demeanor, appeared as someone
they could easily override.
Theirs was an unfortunate
miscalculation. Behind the gentle
façade there was a steely
determination, a penetrating
intelligence and a huge deal of
experience in the music business
now displayed by the new
president. After a while the
executive troublemakers were
removed from the organization,
now out of danger when facing the
competition from BMI that was
threatening its extinction. Gould
presided 8 years over ASCAP, the
best presidency it ever had,
while in the meantime composing
and conducting symphonic
orchestras all over. He never
stopped. "Composing is my
life", he once stated,
"If I stop, Ill have
no life".
Morton Gould died
on February 21st, 1996, aged 82.
He had been invited to play his
music at a concert hall in Disney
World, in Orlando, Florida. Those
who knew him well observed he
seemed weaker than usual that
day, and he complained of not
feeling very well. Yet, he went
through rehearsals with the
orchestra, looking frail and
somewhat stiff, but he signed
autographs and chatted with those
present. The following morning,
his daughter Deborah noticed he
was late in rising, heArd a noise
and looked into his room. He was
on the floor, leaning against one
side of the bed. An artery had
ruptured near his heart, and he
was gone.
He was a prodigy,
indeed, an unquestionable but
never quite appreciated American
musical genius, one that only
time will reveal in his true
stature, as is often the case
with great artists.
During his final
years Morton Gould was a member
of The Robert Farnon Society.
This article
originally appeared in the
December 2009 issue of
Journal Into Melody.
|